Morality Is Acceptable By Your Standards Or Not - 860 Words

MORALITY DOES NOT HAVE ONE FLAVOR Human beings are very complicated creatures. I’m not talking about the shape, I’m referring to the feelings they, have and the technique of their thinking. Each human has his or her own believes and theory, so sometimes people argue about reality and fiction or right and wrong. As humans we do have characteristics such as chivalry, honesty, and trustworthy. Among the feelings and the characteristics comes morality, it is the knowledge of knowing the right and the wrong and distinguish between them but we cannot say that morality have one flavor because some people have a different perspective from others. Through my experience and our religion lessons, anything that makes us behave like an animal is forbidden. As a reader you have to understand the author’s morality through his or her writing so you can determine if the writer’s morality is acceptable by your standards or not. Raymond Carver is an amazing writer although I did not read all of his works, but he always leave the writer hanging at the end not knowing what is happening except for the actions which is a sad thing, also the way he writes about the ending is complicated because the goal of the story lays at the end of it. Unknowing what is the end precisely makes the reader in a huge circle of wondering and of course cannot determine the morality of the story, which is the writer’s morality at the first place. In Popular Mechanics by Raymond CarverShow MoreRelatedHenry : What Are You Doing? Essay976 Words   |  4 Pagescome to learn from your fountain of knowledge. Henry: Tell me my dear Socrates, what you want to know? Socrates: Is there any difference between ethic and morality. This matter has been bothering me and I want to know your view about it. Henry: Socrates do you think there is any difference between ethics and morality? Socrates: Yes, but it seems the same to me my dear friend. Henry: â€Å"The most common way of defining ethics are norms for conduct that distinguish between acceptable and unacceptableRead MorePublic Practice : Only A Little Lie1007 Words   |  5 PagesPerson Construct? In the â€Å"The Moral Diet†, the Good Person Construct is considered to be a standard that instructs people to balance their virtuous self-image with their selfish desires. The Construct is used to manage people rationalizations and their self-deceptions to keep them from getting egregious. Under the Good Person Construct, behaviors, or acts, which come from selfish desires, might be against the morality. They might be minor wrongdoings or transgress that people themselves excuse for throughRead MoreThe Ethics Of Western Ethical Standards1080 Words   |  5 Pagesâ€Å"Ethics is a branch of philosophy, it is also, known as moral philosophy. It helps human deal with human morality and concepts such as good and evil, right and wrong, virtue and vice, justice and crimes.† (†¦.) Most people confused ethic with social conventions, etc. Dr. Richard and Dr. Linda, illustrated the notion with these â€Å"most people confuse ethics with behaving in accordance with social conventions, religious beliefs and the law, and don t treat ethics as a stand-alone concept.†(†¦) They wentRead MoreThe Theory Behind Ethical Relativism1332 Words   |  6 Pagesshould be for the theory behind ethical relativism because it makes for a morally diverse society, has more pros than cons and one should follow what they feel is morally right or wrong. For ethical standards may be concrete or written in stone never to be changed however are important to the standards of moral to the individual person; moral and ethical values are not universal and common among all but vary depending on the culture of the individual person. Cannibalism is either viewed by many asRead MoreCultural Relativism : A Moral Theory1676 Words   |  7 Pagesmoral theory that states that there are ce rtain moral standards that everyone should follow regardless of their opinion and indifference towards them. Cultural relativism is one of the two forms of Ethical Relativism. The latter one belongs to a form of moral skepticism. It states that moral standards are not objective, but relative to the standards of a person or a society. Consequently, cultural relativism is based on the belief that a moral standard is correct only when approved by the system of beliefsRead MoreEssay 11280 Words   |  6 PagesEssay 1 Carolyn Rudy 1. The nation is at war, and your number in the recently reinstated military draft has just come up. The problem is that, after serious reflection, you have concluded that the war is unjust. What advice might Socrates give you? Would you agree? What might you decide to do? Read the Introduction, Chapter 2 Crito and the Conclusion Chapter 40 Phaedo by Plato. Some people think war is justified because; it is in order to counter terrorism. I think theyre wrong becauseRead MoreJustification for Kant’s Moral and Ethical Views in A Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals1639 Words   |  7 Pagesaimed to establish an absolute system of morality based upon reason. Kant’s conceptions regarding what is moral and how someone should behave ethically, are often seen as contradictions to those proposed by Hume, who holds an empirical stance. As mentioned, Kant emphasizes the necessity of basing morality on a priori principles; he puts faith in the power of human rationality and believed that reason alone, not feeling, is a key to advancing human morality. An ethical system based upon reason wouldRead MorePope s Parents By Benedict And The Abnormal Analyzes The Relative Nature Of Morality939 Words   |  4 Pagesnature of morality and how it relates to social and cultural norms. Social norms are constantly changing and evolving depe nding on the environment and time period. Cultural norms are more consistent than social norms. Cultural norms remain constant with time but differ based on the environment a person is in. I plan to use this methodology to explain the morality of my parents’ decision to allow my grandmother to move into our house when I was younger. Society’s approval and cultural standards shouldRead MoreRuth Benedict813 Words   |  4 PagesAre Ethics Relative? Ruth Benedict: Ethics Are Relative ID # : 0804014743 â€Å"Ruth Benedict: Ethics Are Relative †¦ Morality is culturally relative.† In this paper, I’m going to discuss the argument that the famous American anthropologist, Ruth Benedict, has put forth regarding ‘ethical relativism’. Ethical relativism is the theory that holds that morality is relative to the norms and values of ones culture or society. That is, whether an action is classified as right or wrong depends on the moralRead MoreJust Business : Christian Ethics For The Marketplace1064 Words   |  5 Pagesmisused. When this happens, holiness can become forms of legalism, judgementalism, and withdrawal from society. As it relates to Justice, Hill suggests that in the world of business, any behavior within the legal framework that is unclear is morally acceptable in spite of the harmful outcome it may have on other people. Hill writes â€Å"A society without justice is no better than a band of thieves. We know what justice is when we feel the wounds of injustice.† (p. 37) Hill also explains the four aspects